Me (Manga)

[info]eddyfate


Official Blog of Eddy Webb

Formerly "Journal of Fate"


Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry
[Head To Keyboard] 5 things to avoid if you want your submission considered
Writer
[info]eddyfate
A computer keyboard, Space Bar is on the botto...

Image via Wikipedia

I've been kicking around the idea of doing an irregular column of writing advice called "Head To Keyboard" (or HTK for short), basically talking about things that annoy me about being a writer or an editor. I wasn't sure if it would be part of the blogcast or part of this blog, but more and more my blog is about writing anyhow, so I decided to start doing it here.

After two years of handling the White Wolf slush pile, as well as several more years submitting my work to various publishers, I keep running into five things that people keep doing that doesn't help them one bit in getting published. This isn't secret knowledge, arcane information or even sage advice, but people keep screwing it up over and over and over again, so I thought it's stuff probably worth repeating.

Five Things To Avoid

1. Ignoring submission guidelines. The company you want to write for has them there for a reason. Not only does not following the guidelines automatically irritate the slush pile reader (which won't incline him to regard your submission with any particular sympathy), but there may also be legal aspects that need to be followed before your submission can be considered. Even if you get bored and stop reading this blog now, take this piece of advice with you: follow the damned submission guidelines.

2. Talking shit on the Internet. More and more editors will do a Google search on your name to find out more about you. If they find your forum posts and tweets and blogs about how stupid the editor's company is and what horrible products they produce, you'll get a form rejection. Further, editors do talk to each other, and word gets around. You don't have to be in love with everything that a company produces, but posting it for public view on the Internet won't help your long-term prospects.

3. Having special needs. Love it or hate it, Microsoft Word is the standard -- I have run into few companies that don't assume it as the default format (though RTF is a close second), and never met a company that won't accept it at all. If you want to make money as a writer, get Microsoft Word. If you simply can't, get some software that can convert your documents to Microsoft Word and read Word comments and markup (OpenOffice 3 is good, usable on all three main OS formats, and is free). If you absolutely insist on submitting your magnum opus in Microsoft Works or WordPerfect, I hope you enjoy being rejected unread.

4. Using generic submissions. Take a few minutes before you submit and read up on the company you're submitting to. Get the editor's name right. Specify what product you're submitting for. Make sure the company you're submitting to is even accepting submissions for your kind of manuscript. If you don't care enough about the publisher to get a few details right, odds are they won't care enough to publish you.

5. Plagiarizing your material. Seriously, don't do this. Again, one Google search will find you out. If you need to quote, quote and give credit. But that shit didn't fly in high school, and it won't fly now. And as more and more people read your work, eventually someone's going to notice something odd and out you.

I'm not kidding when I say that simply not doing these five things will get you much further in the slush pile.
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Tags: ,

Did someone send you their care bears fanfic in Wordstar format?

I bet the cover letter was like:

Eddie,

I don't actually play RPGs, but I'm sure your company's products are about as much fun as my herpes. But I can change that if only your smart enough to hire me. I had to borrow a friend's computer to type this email, so all my manuscripts will be mailed in, but their genious, so you don't care, lol.

My mother and my uncle both say I'm better than anything you could have possibly published, so hire me!

Winston Z. Worthington, XVII

That is closer to some of the submissions I've seen than you think.

Sadly, I'm not surprised. Funny only works if it has a kernel of truth in it. :P

When I read this out loud in my mind you totally had the voice of Megatron from Beast Wars. I laughed so loudly my neighbor in the next office wondered what was so funny.

Excellent suggestions

[info]iperkins

2009-11-06 03:53 pm (UTC)

My only question concerns #3 - Word sometimes does not format correctly across versions, much less platforms. if you mean "getting the text from one place to another", then I wholeheartedly agree (although a simple text file would accomplish the same end and truly be platform/version agnostic). If formatting is more of an issue, I have to wonder if something like Tex or any of it's variants, like LaTex) wouldn't be a better choice and perhaps be more suitable for typesetting. Anyway, I'm more of a nuts and bolts tyoe. This question may not resonate with anybody else and you are certainly correct that Word is the standard, for all of it's warts.

Re: Excellent suggestions

[info]eddyfate

2009-11-06 03:56 pm (UTC)

I'm not saying Word should be used to "translate," but in those rare cases where a company doesn't accept Word, they should offer an alternative, or handle the formatting issue on their own. Typesetting and layout are completely different animals outside of submissions. :)

Re: Excellent suggestions

[info]eddyfate

2009-11-06 04:04 pm (UTC)

Also, if there's a case where there may be a lot of translating one way or the other, I often see RTF used as the "Rosetta stone," since most word processing programs can use that.

Excellent advice. I only wish you could share some of the slush pile some time :)


Home